Andy Noton, 11 August 2026
A growing number of residential landlords are looking seriously at commercial property for the first time, with trade body Propertymark reporting a marked rise in enquiries from residential landlords to its commercial agents, as investors seek to understand what a move into commercial property would involve.
Michael Sears, a member of the NAEA Commercial Propertymark Advisory Panel, said interest is building from investors moving towards commercial property mainly because there is less of a legislative stranglehold than in the residential sector.
Those making the switch tend to be established portfolio landlords converting existing residential holdings, since the entry barrier to commercial property is generally higher and comes with lower loan-to-value lending.
The trend reflects the cumulative weight of tax and regulatory change on the residential side.
Section 24's restriction of finance cost relief, higher stamp duty on additional properties, the compliance demands of the Renters' Rights Act and the imminent extension of Making Tax
Digital have all narrowed margins and added administrative burden for residential landlords, at the same time as commercial leases continue to offer longer terms, fewer statutory protections for occupiers and generally less day-to-day management.
Steve Lane, also of the advisory panel, said fresh investors increasingly want in-depth advice on the differences between the two markets, particularly around borrowing ratios, tax liabilities and regulatory obligations, before committing to a change of strategy.
The regulatory framework governing commercial leases is far lighter touch than the residential regime.
There is no equivalent of the Renters' Rights Act, no Section 21 or Section 8 possession framework to navigate and considerably more freedom to agree lease terms, break clauses and rent review mechanisms directly with the tenant.
The tax position is different too, as commercial property held personally does not carry the same finance cost relief restriction that applies to residential lets.
Also, depending on the assets involved, capital allowances can be considerably more valuable on commercial buildings than on residential stock, particularly where plant and machinery forms a meaningful part of the purchase price.
Set against this, commercial property brings its own risks. For example, valuations are more sensitive to occupier covenant strength and lease length and business rates, rather than council tax, need to be considered as part of the overall return.
If you are looking to make the switch, you should give some thought to the following:
Moving from residential to commercial property is rarely a simple like-for-like swap. It changes the risk profile, financing structure and management demands of a portfolio as much as its tax position.
That is why it deserves the same level of planning and professional advice as any other significant investment decision.
As tax and regulatory pressures continue to reshape the residential property market, many landlords are reviewing whether commercial property investment could play a role in their long-term strategy. While commercial assets can offer different tax advantages, lease structures and investment opportunities, they also introduce new risks and considerations.
Our property specialists advise landlords, investors and business owners on commercial property acquisitions, portfolio structuring, tax planning and investment strategy to help ensure decisions are aligned with both commercial and financial objectives.
If you would like to discuss whether commercial property investment is right for your portfolio, please contact property partner, Andy Noton (andrewnoton@lubbockfine.co.uk).
Our specialists regularly share insights, guidance and practical updates to help organisations navigate change with confidence. If you'd like to receive future property related updates from our team, you can sign up here.
Many residential landlords are reassessing their investment strategies due to increasing tax and regulatory pressures, including finance cost restrictions, higher Stamp Duty Land Tax rates and additional compliance requirements. Commercial property can offer different opportunities and a less restrictive regulatory environment.
Commercial property ownership can provide access to tax reliefs that may not be available in the same way for residential property. For example, capital allowances may be available on qualifying fixtures and equipment, and finance cost restrictions that apply to residential landlords generally do not apply to commercial properties held personally.
Commercial properties often benefit from longer lease terms and greater flexibility in lease negotiations. However, management requirements vary significantly depending on the property type, tenant and lease structure.
Commercial property values can be heavily influenced by tenant covenant strength, lease length, market demand and economic conditions. Investors should also consider void periods, financing arrangements and business rates when assessing potential returns.
Returns vary depending on the asset, location and market conditions. While commercial property can offer attractive yields in some circumstances, investors should assess both risk and return before making investment decisions.
Investors should review financing options, tax implications, capital allowances opportunities, SDLT considerations, VAT implications and overall portfolio strategy before acquiring commercial property.
Not necessarily. Commercial property requires a different approach to financing, risk management and investment planning. Professional advice can help determine whether commercial property aligns with an investor's objectives.